Skip to main content

Canopy or sliding cover design, which suits the drone in-a-box better?

The Drone in-a-box solution is gaining uprising attention from both the drone industry and the other high-tech industries. Two popular designs are found in the market: the canopy and the sliding cover design, but which one suits the drone in-a-box better?
Drone in-a-box with sliding cover structure
Lets take a look at the sliding cover structure first. By sliding a pair of separate covers to two sides, a drone charging board is exposed and integrates with a landing platform function. This design is the most adopted one, its a classic and robust structure, here I listed the pros and cons.



Pros:
1. Less space and material requires. The sliding cover part of a drone in-a-box hardware requires only a pair of separate covers and a roller (or a pair of a mechanical pulling device).
2. More integrate appearance. As little space is required, the sliding cover makes the whole drone in-a-box look integrated and easy to transport.
Cons:
1. Lower dust-proof performance. Most drone in-a-box systems are for outdoor use, even in a relatively humid environment, dust is unavoidable as the drone take-off and landing would certainly bring. The cleaning work will be annoying especially for the roller design, the pulling design of structure is better in this way.
2. Weaker waterproof ability. No matter how well-sealed the covers are, there still will be some gap, which is big trouble for rainy nights when your drone and the drone in-a-box are outside, while rains are unpredictable. 
HEISHA DNEST drone in-a-box


Drone in-a-box with canopy design
This design is a newcomer and its not really a good-looking one, maybe thats why its unpopular  (It looks like a big bucket that being misplaced). Same as the last structure, it protects the charging and landing board, and the rest control units. This is its pros and cons:
Pros:
1. Better waterproof and dust-proof performance. The dome design is widely used in ancient buildings for its splendid waterproof performance, this is undoubted. The higher dust-proof performance is contributed to the simple design, no roller maintenance work required.
2. Steady performance. The simpler structure, the easier the working process, which enables a steady performance. Unlike giving two orders to the separated covers synchronously, there is only one order takes to switch on or off the canopy.
Cons:
1. Less pretty. This is a big problem yet there is no solution for it.
2. Not easy for transportation. Due to the drone landing area, at least 60 cm length and width board is required even for small size drones like DJI Mavic. To transport such a big round thing, the supplier must be so headache. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 autonomous drone charging and docking stations

Auto mated drone docks are entering into unprecedented competition before the final release of the DJI dock. All these drone docking and charging stations share the same major features including automatic takeoff for carrying out BVOL flight missions, then automated landing and charging the drone for a new round of flight missions.   Some drone charging dock companies has its self-developed drone with a variety of flight times and payload capacities, such as the Sunflower labs, Skydio, Percepto, Easy Aerial, and Dronehub. Some drone dock providers only offer the hardware part, like HEISHA Tech, Skycharge, Hextronics, IDRONEIMAGES, and HIVE Droneport. Not all of these autonomous drone charging dock manufacturers are using the drone battery charging solution, some are taking the battery swapping technology, including Hextronics, Dronehub, and Hive Droneport. Here is the list:   1.  Percepto (2014, USA & Israel, <  2 00 employees) The autonomous Inspection ...

Top 5 automated security drone systems

Security drone systems are rising in speed much faster than before as the requirement for autonomous solutions grows. In some regions, the covid-19 is shaking the stability of people’s daily life, and riots and violence are increasing. Which is boosting the demand for security drone systems.    What matters most to a security drone system? Many companies are endeavoring the progress of autonomous drone systems, but the harsh reality is it may still take a while before a fully autonomous drone system is complete like the unmanned car, there is a giant step exists between 99% and 100% in this case.  No matter how autonomous a drone can make, controlling the flight mission relies on software, which requires humans to trigger it and review the received data.    A. Long time on duty (night vision)  B. Long-range covered C. Quick automated recharge of the drone   1. Sunflower labs (2016, USA & Switzerland, < 50 employees)   Sunflower Labs is one...

Skycharge VS HEISHA drone charging pad

There are several drone charging companies arise in recent years, Skycharge is one of the few that stands for over seven years, while HEISHA is a newcomer, let's make some comparisons between them.   The most obvious part is the drone centering process that the HEISHA drone charging pad requires while Skycharge ' s doesn ' t as dozens of conductors are spread on the Skycharge drone charging pad, and HEISHA ' s only has a few conductors in each side of the landing gears, maybe that ' s one of the reasons make HEISHA drone charging pad cheaper than the Skycharge ' s. Image resource:  https://skycharge.de/ Image resource:  https://www.heishatech.com/   S ky charge HEISHA Work environment Indoor/outdoor Indoor/outdoor Charging  time (charge Mavic 2 fully) 90 minutes 30 minutes Charging method Conductive charging Conductive charging Retrofit Required Required Compatible drones DJI, Parrot DJI, Skydio, 3DR, Propel, SYMA, Sky Viper Material Stainless steel Glass fiber ...